Tensions between Google and its AI brain trust DeepMind have always been interesting. To put the relationship in crude terms: DeepMind, founded in 2010, is home to some the finest AI researchers worldwide who output a constant stream of informative scholastic papers and Nature front covers. Google, on the other hand, bought DeepMind in 2014 and bankrolls its large losses, and it really, actually wishes to squeeze some money out of all those juicy brains.
That’s why a current story on the two companies from The Wall Street Journal is so interesting. In it, Parmy Olson reports that Google has actually ended yearslong settlements in between the 2 firms, eventually turning down a plea from DeepMind for more self-reliance.
According to Olson, DeepMind informed staff the talks were over “late last month.” One tip from DeepMind’s founders was apparently for the business to have the very same legal structure as a not-for-profit, “thinking that the effective expert system they were looking into shouldn’t be managed by a single corporate entity, according to people familiar with those strategies.” Google wasn’t on board with this, telling DeepMind it didn’t make sense thinking about how much cash the company has put into DeepMind.
This conflict isn’t surprising. Google officers have actually stated consistently the business’s future depend on AI, and many news stories recommend the mothership has actually been pressuring DeepMind into advertising its work. This has caused jobs from DeepMind using its research study to enhance battery life on Android and reduce energy expenses in its data centers, but the financial benefits of these efforts are unclear. Meanwhile, the UK company’s losses keep increasing– striking a high of ₤ 477 million (around $660 million) in its most recent public filings for 2019. If Google desires its money’s worth, it can’t give DeepMind anything like nonprofit status.
Alongside financial pressures, another bone of contention in between the two business seems to be ethical oversight. A much-trumpeted element in Google’s acquisition of DeepMind was a guarantee that Google would set up a principles board to guarantee its innovation was always deployed fairly. The specific nature and scope of this board, however, including who sits on it, has actually constantly been unclear. A 2019 report from The Economist stated the board even held ownership over any artificial general intelligence produced by DeepMind– a term that describes AI that satisfies or goes beyond human capacity throughout a broad range of tasks.
The status of this board is not discussed in the WSJ‘s report, but Olson keeps in mind that DeepMind’s future work will now be supervised by a separate ethics board “staffed primarily by senior Google executives.” Olson kept in mind in a tweet that this is the Advanced Technology Review Council, or ATRC. This is supposedly Google’s “greatest evaluation board.”
Update, May 21st, 11:04 AM ET: Story has been upgraded to note that the principles board discussed in the WSJ‘s report is the ATRC.
, but the monetary benefits of these efforts are uncertain. (around $660 million) in its most current public filings for 2019. Alongside monetary pressures, another bone of contention in between the 2 companies seems to be ethical oversight. A much-trumpeted aspect in Google’s acquisition of DeepMind was a promise that Google would set up a principles board to guarantee its technology was constantly deployed relatively. The specific nature and scope of this board, however, including who sits on it, has actually constantly been unclear.