When we examined the Radeon RX 6700 XT on day one, we found it to be about 4% slower than the RTX 3070 in a 14-game sample. We collected that data utilizing our older Ryzen 9 3950X test system. Today we have an even more robust set of 45 video games working on top of a Ryzen 9 5950X along with the most recent display chauffeurs which have actually brought some nice gains for the RTX 3070 in titles such as Godfall, Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, and Dirt 5.
Time for another of our mega-game criteria covering 45 titles comparing the Radeon RX 6700 XT head-to-head against the GeForce RTX 3070, the closest rival in terms of pricing, a minimum of based on the legendary MSRP.
Unfortunately, while performance in some games has actually improved, accessibility has not,
buy? With that, let’s go over the test system specifications and leap into the standards. Our Ryzen 9 5950X test system was equipped with 32GB of DDR4-3200 CL14 dual-rank memory. Representing both the GeForce and Radeon GPUs are Gigabyte Gaming OC graphics cards, but do note that in both cases we’ve clocked them to match the RTX 3070 and RX 6700 XT reference spec with no overclocking. We’re utilizing GeForce Game Ready Driver 465.89 and Adrenalin 2020 Edition 21.3.2 chauffeurs. Smart Access Memory was not allowed and this is always the case unless defined otherwise. First, we’ll individually have a look at around half a lots of the more intriguing video games in terms of test results and then jump into breakdown graphs to summarize all the benchmark information. Criteria Starting with Apex Legends we find that at 1080p, the RTX 3070 is up to 22%faster
which is quite a considerable margin. It’s worth keeping in mind that the 6700 XT did typical 162 fps using high quality settings, so for competitive quality settings frame rates are going to be more than adequate with either item, but if you’re after maximum performance in Apex, you’ll be better off with the GeForce. The RTX 3070 was also 19%faster at 1440p and for those using the premium settings, the difference in between
113 and 135 fps can be observed with a high refresh rate monitor. Performance was more uniformly matched in CoD Warzone as the RTX 3070 was ~ 3% faster at 1080p and 8% faster at 1440p. The margin does open to 12% in favor of the GeForce at 4K, though I suspect couple of gamers will be targeting 4K with these GPUs.
with both GPUs nearly constantly out of stock. With stock clearly out of everybody’s control, this comparison acts as a guide for those researching what they might acquire once supply is able to fulfill or exceed need. There’s always a possibility, if you’re patient enough, you’ll eventually get your hands on among these GPUs. At some point, the circumstance will improve and when it does, this contrast review will help address the question, which of the two GPUs should you
Fortnite has constantly greatly favored Nvidia, though
Although efficiency for the RTX 3070 has enhanced in Assassin’s Creed Valhalla considering that our last test, the 6700 XT still enjoys a performance benefit here.
at 1440p before hanging back to a 7%lead at 4K. A win here for AMD and the performance uplift at 1440p will be noticed for those playing Borderlands 3. Frame rates are also competitive in Cyberpunk 2077 (before making it possible for DLSS). The RTX 3070
substantially better efficiency than the 6700 XT in this title (DLSS/RT discussion aside). Performance in Hitman 2 is very similar on either GPU. The RTX 3070 was as soon as again faster at all 3 checked resolutions, though we’re looking at a relatively small 6%performance benefit. Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 is heavily CPU bound at 1080p and as a result, both the 6700 XT
and RTX 3070 are seen providing roughly the very same efficiency. This changes at 1440p, the 1%low outcome is still CPU minimal, but the typical frame rate is now much greater utilizing the RTX 3070. A 23% performance uplift is significant. That margin is extended at 4K to 26%, though neither GPU is capable of delivering playable efficiency at
4K. Borderlands 3 is the very first video game that we discover where the 6700 XT is much faster than the RTX 3070 by a reasonable margin. At 1080p the Radeon GPU was 12 %faster, then 13%faster
AMD has actually made some inroads here. Still, when compared to the RTX 3070, the 6700 XT was a fair bit slower, tracking by a 14%margin at 1080p, 17 %at 1440p, and 20%at 4K. Presuming you have a relatively contemporary CPU that isn’t being greatly made use of when playing Fortnite, the RTX 3070 is going to deliver
. When you run out of VRAM, this is a great example of what takes place. The 8GB buffer on the RTX 3070 is overwhelmed as the video game calls for 9.5 GB of memory at this setting. As an outcome, video game possessions begin flowing through the PCI Express bus into system memory at a substantially slower rate than local VRAM. Of course, the easy fix here is to reduce the demand on VRAM by lowering texture size, for instance. The video game most likely needs only small tweaks to resolve the issue, but you will be reducing visuals to get the game performing at a satisfying level. Which does make us wonder how long it will be before this is basic operating procedure for
XT has a minor performance benefit here due to the larger VRAM buffer. Doom Eternal consumes to 9GB of VRAM at 4K, so the overflow into system memory does lead to a small performance hit for the RTX 3070. At 1080p and 1440p frame rates are excessively high, so the margins there do not truly matter, but as luck would have it both delivered the very same experience. Speaking of VRAM, I desired to include these Ghost Recon Breakpoint results using the ultra-quality predetermined, which is not the maximum pre-programmed which is called ‘ultimate ‘. These results might look a bit off at very first glance due to the fact that at 1080p they’re neck and neck, then at 1440p the GeForce GPU pulls ahead, but finally performing at 4K it’s the 6700 XT delivering more than twice the efficiency
those with 8GB graphics cards. Last up we have Kingdom Come Deliverance. We wanted to go over these outcomes because when evaluating the
RX 6800 series we saw how AMD Big Navi GPUs were experiencing efficiency problems in video games utilizing the CryEngine, like this one. The RX 6800, for instance, was topped at 71 fps at 1080p and 65 fps at 1440p. Thankfully, it looks like AMD has actually dealt with those issues since the 6700 XT is now able to render 109 fps typically at 1080p and 84 fps at 1440p. It’s still slower than the RTX 3070, but performance is more where you ‘d anticipate it to be.
=””class=”b-lazy “> Moving on to F1 2020, we discover fairly competitive performance throughout the 3 tested resolutions. The RTX 3070 was 4% faster at 1080p, 8%faster at 1440p and 9%faster at 4K. Possibly most notably, we are looking at 15-20 %higher 1 %low performance with the GeForce GPU.< img height=" 1353" src ="data: image/svg+xml,% 3Csvg% 20xmlns= 'http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%2016%209'%3E%3C/svg%3E "width ="1336 "data-src= "https://static.techspot.com/articles-info/2227/bench/FH4.png"alt=" "class
=”b-lazy”> Forza Horizon 4 has made it back into our benchmark suite thanks to its migration from the Windows Store to Steam. For a long period of time, this game heavily preferred AMD GPUs, but Nvidia has attended to efficiency and now we’re looking at a circumstance where the RTX 3070 is a great bit much faster than the 6700 XT, winning by a 15% margin at 1080p, 14% at 1440p, and 15 %at 4K, so quite constant scaling there. Nearly identical frame rates in Doom Eternal and this time it was the Radeon GPU that pulled ahead at 4K, albeit by simply a 5% margin. Normally, it’s the other way around, but I think the 6700
and 6700 XT provide virtually identical performance at 1080p and 1440p, with the GeForce GPU running away at 4K with a 17 %benefit, though as held true in Flight Simulator 2020, performance at 4K was not playable with these settings. Control is an awful situation for AMD and that’s mainly due to it being an Nvidia sponsored game that was used to showcase RTX features. AMD hasn’t had the ability to enhance for this one and as a result the RTX 3070 was plainly faster at 1080p with an enormous 28%margin
, then 31%faster at 1440p and 38 %faster at 4K. We find performance in Red Dead Redemption 2 to be very competitive with nothing separating these two GPUs at 1080p and 1440p. As usual, the RTX 3070 enjoys an efficiency benefit at 4K, retreating by a 9%margin to typical 51 fps. The Outer Worlds is based on Unreal Engine 4 and as is frequently the case with games using this extremely popular video game engine, the outcomes swing greatly in Nvidia’s favor. Here the RTX 3070 was 17% faster at 1080p, 29% faster at 1440p and 28% faster at 4K. Like Control this is another wipeout for AMD.
We’re taking a look at an 18%win at 1080p for AMD and 10%at 1440p. At 4K, the RTX 3070 does get a small upper hand.< img height=" 1353"src= "data: image/svg+xml,% 3Csvg% 20xmlns ='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%2016%209'%3E%3C/svg%3E"width=" 1336 "data-src=" https://static.techspot.com/articles-info/2227/bench/F1.png "alt
Now at 1440p the space does expand. It’s far from significant overall, but here the 6700 XT is 8%slower on average. It was also slower by a 10% or greater margin in 17 of the video games tested. Essentially, for 1440p gaming the RTX 3070 is not only the faster product however
That’s how the Radeon 6700 XT and GeForce RTX 3070 compare in 16 of the 45 games we tested. Rather of having you spend a massive amount of your time discussing the other 30 graphs, here’s a summary of the results at 1080p and 1440p.
At 1080p, throughout the 45 games tested, we see that the 6700 XT is on typical 4%slower than the RTX 3070, which is precisely what we discovered in our day-one review using a select 14 video game sample. Of the 45 games, there had to do with a lots where the
6700 XT was slower by a 10%margin or greater. Control and Apex Legends might be thought about the outliers in this information. For those wondering however, if we got rid of Control and Apex Legends results, the 6700 XT is still 4 %slower on average. That’s still close sufficient to call a technical draw, albeit if you’re a devoted Fortnite or Apex Legends player, you may wish to go with the RTX 3070, but if you’re into Battlefield V, the 6700 XT might be a much better option.
also the better value item,
One last thing to keep in mind. While I do choose the RTX 3070 over the 6700 XT, the RX 6800 ends up being an interesting proposal at $580. That’s 16% more than the 3070, however those additional $80 get you two times the VRAM and for those that like to keep their graphics card for more than 2 years, I feel the additional VRAM will come into play, presuming you play the most recent titles with the visuals maxed out. It’s also 11% faster at 1440p according to our testing, and even without DLSS, you’re taking a look at well over 144 fps in a game like Fortnite.
It simply happens to be the case I’m a Fortnite player and the GeForce GPU
As we’ve talked about previously, the Radeon 6700 XT could be made a more compelling choice by damaging the RTX 3070’s pricing, but since of the current circumstance and GPU demand, it just does not make sense for AMD to take any such steps. In a scenario where we’re back to MSRP prices across the board, the 6700 XT would require to be priced no greater than $400– the same price as the 5700 XT– to become my leading option in this shootout.
Ray tracing support keeps growing, but as you likely know by now, that’s of no interest to me. It’s nonetheless an extra feature of the GeForce RTX series which you might appreciate. DLSS support is also rather restricted, but if you can benefit from it in the games you play, the performance benefits can be quite considerable.
If you had the high-end of buying either GPU at or near the MSRP, which one should you get? In between the two, our choice would be the GeForce RTX 3070.
so not an ideal scenario for AMD. What We Learned There you have it. For those of you wanting to see how the Radeon RX 6700 XT and GeForce RTX 3070 compare in a massive series of video games, you have your answer. Things haven’t altered much from our day-one evaluations. The 6700 XT fared a little even worse at 1440p, but eventually it does not change our conclusion.
Back to our two-way contrast, while the 6700 XT uses more VRAM and is expected to be somewhat less expensive, it’s not compelling sufficient offered the inferior encoding assistance, weaker general efficiency, and present lack of a DLSS competitor. Which’s truly all I have to state on this one.
is already quicker prior to you even allow DLSS, making it the apparent option for me. I likewise just play multiplayer games and normally choose competitive-type quality settings, so memory capacity is not an issue. When utilizing NVENC, we also like the greater recording quality. It’s a little enhancement when tape-recording, but it is much better and if
you stream it’s a lot much better. The Radeon RX 6700 XT stays a solid graphics card and need to hold up well into the future, mostly thanks to that 12GB VRAM buffer. We’re starting to see a couple of examples where you can run out of memory with 8GB of VRAM, though they’re still scarce. Right now, you can easily get away with an 8GB frame buffer, however whether or not that will hold true in a year or two remains to be seen. I’m a little skeptical, at least for those looking for maximum in-game visuals.
Our Ryzen 9 5950X test system was geared up with 32GB of DDR4-3200 CL14 dual-rank memory. Frame rates are likewise competitive in Cyberpunk 2077 (before enabling DLSS). We find performance in Red Dead Redemption 2 to be extremely competitive with absolutely nothing separating these 2 GPUs at 1080p and 1440p. The Outer Worlds is based on Unreal Engine 4 and as is typically the case with video games utilizing this extremely popular video game engine, the results swing greatly in Nvidia’s favor. Now at 1440p the space does widen.