Nvidia RTX 3070 vs 3080: how much faster is Nvidias flagship GPU? – Rock Paper Shotgun

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX 3080 are 2 of the best and most effective graphics cards around right now, even if the ongoing stock lacks imply you can’t in fact buy one at the minute. However when they do eventually return to shop shelves, which one should you think about buying? Is the RTX 3080 truly worth paying all that additional cash for, or are you much better off with the substantially more affordable RTX 3070? I’ve put both graphics cards head to head in today’s greatest and most demanding video games to discover.

Costs are, undoubtedly, all over the shop right now, but under typical scenarios the RTX 3080 ought to cost around ₤ 649/ $699. The RTX 3070, on the other hand, is ₤ 200/ $200 less, starting at ₤ 469/ $499. That’s quite a big distinction if you’re budgeting for a new PC construct at the minute, so you’ll wish to make sure you’re getting the best graphics card for your PC prior to you begin. If the RTX 3070 ends up being more than enough for your existing requirements, then there’s no requirement to spend another ₤ 200/ $200 on the RTX 3080.

To check the RTX 3070 and RTX 3080, I utilized the same GPUs that I checked in my initial graphics card evaluates: the Zotac GeForce RTX 3070 Twin Edge and the Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 OC. I ran both cards at their default clock speeds, so the performance figures listed below ought to be relatively representative of what you’ll find on other types of RTX 3070 and RTX 3080 cards somewhere else. I’ve also kept ray tracing switched off for this specific comparison test, as I’ll be taking a more detailed look at next-gen ray tracing efficiency across all of the new AMD and Nvidia GPUs in a dedicated comparison piece.

When it comes to the rest of my PC specs, I paired both cards with my usual Intel Core i5-10600K processor and 16GB of Corsair Vengeance Pro RAM and put them head to head in my suite of graphics standards, taking a typical frame rate from their own integrated benchmarking tools or from my own repeatable manual gameplay tests. These video games include a mix of blockbusters from the last number of years: Shadow Of The Tomb Raider, Total War: Three Kingdoms, Final Fantasy XV, Monster Hunter: World, Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, The Witcher 3, Metro Exodus and Cyberpunk 2077.

I checked every game at 1920×1080, 2560×1440 and 4K, so you can see precisely what’s possible across a range of different graphics settings. Naturally, both of these cards are geared towards 4K gaming rather than playing at 1080p, and there are lots of cheaper graphics cards readily available, such as the RTX 3060 Ti or AMD’s Radeon RX 5600 XT if that’s the sort of resolution you’re intending for. I’ve included them here for the sake of completeness, but what we’re truly focusing on here is how each card fares at 2560×1440 and 4K. All that in mind, let’s take an appearance at some beautiful bar charts.

Nvidia RTX 3070 vs 3080: 1080p standards

Needless to say, neither the RTX 3070 nor RTX 3080 are going to struggle to play video games at on max settings at 1920×1080 today, as even the most requiring of today’s big video games – Assassin’s Creed Valhalla and Cyberpunk 2077 – are both well into 70s and 80s when it pertains to average frame rate. Admittedly, there isn’t as much of a distinction as you may anticipate offered the cost difference of these two cards, and as you can see from the benchmark results listed below, the RTX 3070 in fact had a higher average frame rate in Cyberpunk 2077 in my benchmarking results than the RTX 3080.


A bar graph showing how the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 compares against the RTX 3080 on Ultra settings at 1080p

The very same thing took place in Monster Hunter: World as well, and even Final Fantasy XV was practically neck and neck. Nevertheless, this is most likely down to my choice of processor more than anything else, however, since if a graphics card is going to be CPU-bound at any of the 3 major resolutions nowadays, it’s 1920×1080. Obviously, Intel’s Core i5-10600K is barely a slouch when it pertains to gaming performance, but it simply goes to reveal that just bunging in a new GPU to your PC does not necessarily always equal faster frame rates if you do not also have the right CPU to stay up to date with it.

In any case, however, even if you do have a more powerful Core i7 or Ryzen 7 processor available, it’s still not likely you’ll have the ability to notice a discernible distinction between these two cards at 1080p – unless, of course, you’re especially susceptible to playing games at 120fps versus 110fps. My eyes certainly can’t inform the difference between these sort of frame rates without the help of a frame rate counter, so there’s absolutely not much point paying extra for the RTX 3080 at this resolution – specifically when the even cheaper RTX 3060 Ti does it practically as well as the RTX 3070.

Nvidia RTX 3070 vs 3080: 1440p criteria

As I said above, however, 1080p gaming isn’t what these 2 cards are planned for. Instead, they’re actually focused on perfect 2560×1440 video gaming and 4K. Taking a look at the former very first, you can see below that both cards are more than capable of playing games on max settings at 1440p, as even the RTX 3070 can handle approximately 60fps+ in practically every game going. The only one that saw it drop below approximately 60fps was Cyberpunk 2077 – although this can be quickly corrected by enabling the game’s DLSS support.


A bar graph showing how the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 compares against the RTX 3080 on Ultra settings at 1440p

Indeed, for the most part the RTX 3080 was a good 20fps in front of the RTX 3070, although some video games such as Assassin’s Creed Valhalla and Final Fantasy XV saw this gap narrow to simply 7-8fps. Personally, I ‘d still err on the side of the RTX 3070 here, as everything can be played completely smoothly here(including Cyberpunk 2077 with DLSS ), and I’m still uncertain my eyes can truly tell the distinction in between 90fps and 70fps-which’s presuming you’ve got a high refresh rate display that can really make usage of those extra frames, too. If you’ve still got a routine 60Hz monitor, then both cards will appear to run games at a capped 60fps anyhow, making the RTX 3070 the clear winner here.

Obviously, offered that some of today’s most demanding video games such as Assassin’s Creed Valhalla are already pushing the RTX 3070 pretty near to that 60fps sweet area, some of you might believe that it’s worth investing that extra money in the RTX 3080 so you can carry on playing games on max settings at 1440p for longer. Which’s a completely valid conclusion, if that’s what you desire to invest your cash on. Alternatively, you might simply knock the settings to High and still get perfectly smooth frame rates for much more years to come. Certainly, the RTX 3070 handled approximately 72fps on High at 1440p, which isn’t really all that different from the RTX 3080’s average of 80fps on the same settings. It truly depends upon how much you value having the ability to play games on max settings all the time, and whether you’re fine with sometimes knocking the settings down to High in order to preserve those smooth 60fps efficiency levels.

Nvidia RTX 3070 vs 3080: 4K benchmarks

If you’re planning on purchasing a graphics card for 4K gaming, however, then the RTX 3080 is almost certainly worth paying out for, particularly if you wish to make sure your PC is well future-proofed against the games of tomorrow. Certainly, while both cards can hit a minimum of 60fps on Medium settings at 4K in the majority of today’s big video games, there are still a number of circumstances where the RTX 3070 begins to show its restrictions, particularly in today’s newest games, Assassin’s Creed Valhalla and Cyberpunk 2077.


A bar graph showing how the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 compares with the RTX 3080 at 4K on Medium settings

Of course, an average of 59fps in Valhalla is still absolutely nothing to be smelled at, however the reality the RTX 3070 can just handle this on Medium graphics settings does not bode well for its general durability as a 4K graphics card as the years roll on. Cyberpunk 2077 a minimum of has the benefit of DLSS to help bump up the numbers a bit, striking well over 60fps on Medium with DLSS switched on, however let’s not forget that the variety of games that really support DLSS Now are still couple of and far in between. This may change with time, however right now it’s still prematurely to state simply how respected DLSS assistance is going to be down the line. Rather, the huge majority of 2021’s games and beyond are most likely to be in the very same

kind of situation as Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, and when we start moving up the quality scale, those near-60fps frame rates quickly start dropping pretty rapidly. When we bump up the settings to High, for instance, the RTX 3070 quickly starts providing an average closer to 50fps in today’s huge video games, while the RTX 3080 is, for the most part, still well above 60fps, keeping a 15-20fps lead over its RTX sibling. Again, Assassin’s Creed Valhalla remains a difficult nut to break at 4K, balancing 58fps on the RTX 3080, as does Cyberpunk 2077, where its routine, non-DLSS typical levels out at just 45fps. Overall, however, the RTX 3080 is absolutely in a much better position than the RTX 3070 to keep delivering those close-to-60fps/ 60fps+ frame rates at these sort of quality settings as time goes on.

Heck, it’s likewise in a much better position to keep running at close-to-60fps on Ultra settings, too, as the graph listed below programs we’re still looking at some really good frame rates on max settings throughout the board here. Undoubtedly, while the RTX 3070 can manage 60fps in a couple of games here – Shadow Of The Tomb Raider and The Witcher III – these titles are getting on a bit now. Sure, if your Steam library mostly consists of games from 2018 or earlier, then the RTX 3070 is most likely going to be a pretty good choice. Nevertheless, if you’re the kind of individual who wishes to play the most recent and biggest on release, then the RTX 3080 is practically a no-brainer here.


A bar graph showing how the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 compares with the RTX 3080 at 4K on Ultra settings

Naturally, there are still going to be a few video games that offer the RTX 3080 trouble on max settings(particularly if they do not have DLSS assistance) -I’m looking at you, Total War and Assassin’s Creed Valhalla – but general that’s a pretty decent set of numbers from today’s huge smash hits. Better than downing along at 35-45fps like the RTX 3070 in a lot of cases, as this is the kind of difference you definitely can value without the help of a frame rate counter.

Nvidia RTX 3070 vs 3080: which is best?

Plainly, the RTX 3080 is the superior card in nearly every circumstances when you take a look at the raw benchmarking figures, but unless you’ve got a 4K gaming display, there’s actually no requirement to spend all that additional money for it. The RTX 3080 is a great card, no doubt about it, but the RTX 3070 is simply as capable at providing quickly, smooth frame rates at 1920×1080 and 2560×1440, and is a much better choice for your wallet total (and heck, if you’re truly only after a card for 1920×1080, then you ‘d be doing yourself an even bigger favour by opting for the even cheaper RTX 3060 Ti or AMD’s Radeon RX 5600 XT instead).

The RTX 3080 truly only comes into its own when you begin pressing up to 4K, at which point that additional ₤ 200/ $200 begins to feels like cash well spent. After all, whatever resolution you’re looking to play games at, you preferably desire a card that can play video games at 60fps on High settings directly off the bat, if only to ensure you’ve got enough headroom to continue playing video games at a decent quality setting at that resolution in the years to come. If you only get a card that can do 60fps on Low or Medium settings, on the other hand, then it won’t be long before you have to desert that resolution completely and drop down to the next one.

In summary, you should absolutely save up for the RTX 3080 if you’re hankering after that high-end 4K video gaming experience, however if you’ve currently just a 2560×1440 gaming display, then the RTX 3070 will do you simply fine.

For more GPU contrasts have a look at:

I ran both cards at their default clock speeds, so the efficiency figures below must be relatively representative of what you’ll find on other types of RTX 3070 and RTX 3080 cards somewhere else. The exact same thing occurred in Monster Hunter: World as well, and even Final Fantasy XV was pretty much neck and neck. Indeed, in the majority of cases the RTX 3080 was a great 20fps in front of the RTX 3070, although some video games such as Assassin’s Creed Valhalla and Final Fantasy XV saw this space narrow to just 7-8fps. Of course, offered that some of today’s most requiring video games such as Assassin’s Creed Valhalla are currently pushing the RTX 3070 quite close to that 60fps sweet area, some of you may believe that it’s worth investing that extra money in the RTX 3080 so you can bring on playing video games on max settings at 1440p for longer. Naturally, there are still going to be a few video games that provide the RTX 3080 problem on max settings(particularly if they do not have DLSS assistance) -I’m looking at you, Total War and Assassin’s Creed Valhalla – however total that’s a pretty good set of numbers from today’s big hits.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.