XMG Apex 15 review: Ryzen 9 3950X in a laptop – and were not kidding – Eurogamer.net

To see this content please make it possible for targeting cookies. Manage cookie settings Seeing is believing. Here’s the Digital Foundry video review for the Ryzen-powered XMG Apex 15. Maker info about

  • the XMG Apex 15 is offered here, with direct access to the various setup options here. In supplying the Ryzen 9 3900 for evaluation, XMG likewise exposes how this
  • technological miracle is accomplished. The non-X 3900 is a 65W TDP part vs the standard 105W TFP in the desktop version. Compared to the full-fat model, you get the bulk of the performance, but with a big decrease in power draw. There is no such 65W model of the 3950X, however, so the BIOS of the note pad simply changes it into eco mode, imposing a 65W limitation. The genuine question is just how much of the totally opened experience the laptop offers you-and the responses are unexpected. Of course, there are compromises in aiming to provide correct desktop efficiency.

    It’s in terms of form aspect. The XMG Apex 15 is certainly a 15-inch note pad in regards to its X and Y dimensions, but it’s considerably thicker and much deeper than the usual note pad. What this does suggest, however, is that you get full-size ports-including Ethernet- and they are positioned to the left, the right and on the back of the system. There, you get HDMI, USB-C (with video output assistance)and mini-Displayport. There’s likewise the power input there, with XMG providing a 230W external PSU, and for the Ryzen 9 3950X in gaming, it in fact maxes out its abilities. Totally let loose, this thing is monstrous.

    Even at 65W, the Ryzen chips are drawing far more power than most laptop parts, so the cooling assembly is stressed heavily under load. At full throttle it’s extremely, very loud-there’s no doubt about it. XMG’s solution is merely to use the user option. In the custom-made control panel, there are four modes: power saving, peaceful, entertainment and performance. Entertainment is the standard, while performance totally unlocks the processor (within the 65W limitation, naturally). I ran Cinebench R20 in both single thread and multi-core modes on both Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen 9 3950X and these are the outcomes I got. In portion terms, it does seem to be the case that the 3900 maintains more of its performance the lower down the chain of modes you go, however then once again, it is a chip particularly created for the 65W power envelope. And did we mention it does hardware-accelerated ray tracing too? Power Saving Peaceful Mode Home entertainment Performance CineBench R20 3900 385/970 486/2628 490/5105 494/6474 Cinebench R20 3950X 267/1276 292/1971 454/4598 486/7501 I found the peaceful mode to be perfectly serviceable for general PC tasks, however power-saving was not a particularly great experience at

    all. I also can’t suggest the system for running from battery power-the CPU

    clocks down enormously on all cores and becomes far less responsive. There’s just a 62WHr battery

    too, meaning that even with hobbled efficiency, you ‘ll be very lucky

    indeed to

    get an hour’s worth of use from the maker. This is unashamedly a desktop replacement however, and I consider the battery to be there just to keep the machine active on the go before plugging it in someplace else. And when I say desktop replacement, I mean it. To get a concept of the fundamental power level of this maker, I switched into performance mode and ran Cinebench R20. I then stacked up the outcomes with our desktop scores database and then included the Asus Zephyrus G14 laptop, based on the Ryzen 4000’Renoir’APU(which has eight cores and 16 threads with a 35W TDP). The outcomes are incredible: both 3900 and 3950X in the laptop computer beat Renoir in single-core efficiency and provide a 55 per cent/79 percent improvement in multi-core output. What’s outstanding here is that Renoir really is the cutting edge in mobile CPUs today. The Apex 15 annihilates it. However it’s the desktop comparisons that are interesting. We’re not making life easier for the Apex 15 here-our library outcomes are based on Ryzen chips that have no thermal constraints and perform at full power. On top of that, they’re combined with faster memory with much lower latency. However, the 3950X delivers 81 percent of the full chip’s performance level, and it’s seven percent much faster than a desktop 3900X. The 3900 non-X chip in the Apex 15 provides 92 per cent of the 3900X’s desktop output. The Apex 15 at the bottom, Dell XPS 15 in the middle and Asus Zephyrus G14 on top. The XMG is a bit of an unit in regards to thickness. 3950X Laptop 3900 Laptop 3900X Desktop 3950X Desktop 4900HS Laptop Cinebench R20 1T 486 494 514 514 477 Cinebench R20 MT 7501 6474 7032 9249 4192 Handbrake h. 264 55.0 fps 44.8 fps 51.8 fps 64.7 fps 26.5 fps Handbrake HEVC 20.4 fps 17.6 fps

    20.3 fps 25.6 fps 9.5 fps The video encoding tests are also impressive. We encode 4K video in Handbrake utilizing requiring h. 264 and HEVC settings, causing debilitating workloads where all cores are maxed for an extended amount of time

    . In h. 264, the laptop 3950X delivers 85 percent of the desktop verson’s

    output. The 3900 is about the same, with 86 it’s loud, it’s happy and it powers on through at optimal speed right through to completion

    . Video gaming provides a completely various challenge

    , however, with CPU utilisation that rarely soaks all cores however does use them in many cases. Core clocks are just as essential as core count-probably more so, in fact. You can get a much better idea of video gaming efficiency from the video evaluation embedded above, however the headline stats are pretty simple. In raw performance terms, the Ryzen 9 3900 and 3950X in the laptop are only separated by a few percentage points and by and large, it’s up there with a desktop Ryzen 5 3600X keeping up 3600MHz DDR4. By extention then, it’ll be really near a complete desktop Ryzen 7 3700X in gaming expertise. The takeaway is pretty straightforward-it is desktop-class CPU performance and you’re usually getting 90 percent or

    more of the output of the exact same chip running in a desktop system with faster memory. Contrasts against Ryzen 4000 Renoir are interesting- we are clearly handling considerably greater performance here. I checked by running my essential benchmark games at 720p resolution, successfully getting rid of the RTX 2070 from the equation as a restricting aspect. The nature of the Apex 15’s GPU is worth some assessment-principally due to the fact that it’s the only component of the laptop you can’t upgrade. What you’re getting is the exact same silicon as the desktop version of the GPU, but it’s downclocked to fit within a tighter power spending plan. The end outcome is that in a lot of scenarios, efficiency is essentially point-for-point identical to the desktop RTX 2060. I did find it to be 5 percent faster than the 2060 in The Witcher 3, but otherwise, it’s on par. This makes the choice of a 1080p/144Hz screen more understandable, however I ‘d have preferred 1440p rather personally. Something to keep in mind is that being an RTX 2070, you still get 8GB of GDDR6 memory- 2GB more than a desktop 2060.

    While doing so, the most significant issue I have with the 2060 is removed. To see this material please make it possible for targeting cookies. Manage cookie settings Essentially, what we have here is a desktop replacement that provides unmatched mobile power by efficiently providing a miniaturised desktop PC. Graphics aside, you can update it like a desktop, there’s a heap of expandability in there and if you really push the specification with high-end processors and memory, you essentially have an incomparably portable workstation that outperforms the large bulk of the modern-day desktop PCs out there. As the results came in on this maker, I continually admired the performance. It’s utterly ridiculous. It’s practically like the anti-thesis of the Asus Zephyrus G14 I’ve been utilizing since late. In that case, Asus provided an excellent 14-inch thin-and-light machine based upon the ultra-efficient Ryzen 4000. The XMG Apex 15 lacks its improvement, its develop quality and its form factor, but

    what you do get is a substantial increase in processing

    Leave a Reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.